Social Value Trust
The public-facing brand through which ONEMODEL's social value capabilities are made available to organisations. SVT is where you engage - for consultations, tiered services, and evidence products.

About
Social Value Trust is a Canadian social value measurement service, powered by CANCEA's ONEMODEL platform and built and operated by Symcura. Together they represent more than 20 years of social value measurement work and more than 400 client engagements across housing, pensions, infrastructure, health, and policy.
Billions are invested each year in programmes, policies, assets, and services intended to improve lives. Very little of that investment is guided by evidence that shows who actually benefits, by how much, and through what pathways.
SVT was founded to close that gap. Not with borrowed averages or fragmented estimates - but with person-level evidence generated from one connected model. Evidence that boards, regulators, funders, and the public can defend.
The public-facing brand through which ONEMODEL's social value capabilities are made available to organisations. SVT is where you engage - for consultations, tiered services, and evidence products.
The group dedicated to the science of decision-making and measurement. Symcura operates the platform, employs the team, and holds SVT as its social value practice.
The Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis. CANCEA built ONEMODEL over two decades and has delivered 400+ client engagements. The science, the platform, and the engagement record are shared with SVT.
The science, the platform, and the team are the same. SVT is how social value evidence reaches you.
Five principles guide every SVT engagement:
Individual welfare paths are preserved before any aggregate is reported. The total never hides who it is really about.
Social value is the difference between the world with the intervention and the world without it - never just the outcomes observed under the intervention.
Hundreds of social value topics are measured in one connected model, person by person - so a benefit counted once cannot be counted again.
Every valuation choice and calibration parameter is declared and sensitivity-tested. The methodology does not hide its assumptions - it invites scrutiny of them.
SVT does not claim its models are true. Decision-grade analysis makes assumptions, evidence, uncertainty, mechanisms, and constraints visible enough for consequential decisions to be examined and defended.
Major decisions about people should be backed by evidence about people: who benefits, by how much, through which pathways, and over what period.
More spending is not automatically better, and less is not automatically worse. Strong programmes should be identified and defended; weaker ones should be redirected when the evidence supports it.
Tell us about your context. We will tell you what evidence is possible.
Start a Conversation